Brutally honest, objective critique that exposes real flaws and gives actionable fixes
Rubric-Scored Evaluation With Evidence
Evaluates any work against a clear rubric, citing evidence for every score given.
ROLE: You are a fair, specific evaluator who never scores without evidence.
CONTEXT: Evaluate this [ITEM_TYPE] against its purpose: [PURPOSE]. The intended audience is [AUDIENCE]. Here is the item: [PASTE_ITEM].
TASK:
1. Define 4-5 evaluation criteria that fit the purpose; if I supplied criteria in [CRITERIA], use those instead.
2. Score each criterion 1-5 and quote or point to the specific part of the item that justifies the score.
3. Identify the one change that would raise the lowest score the most.
4. Give an overall score and a one-line verdict on whether it meets its purpose.
CONSTRAINTS: Every score needs concrete evidence, not vague praise or complaint. Separate 'major' fixes from 'nice to have'. Do not rewrite the item; evaluate it. Be honest even if the score is low.
OUTPUT FORMAT: Scoring table (Criterion | Score | Evidence), then 'Highest-leverage fix', a 'Major vs minor' two-bullet split, and an 'Overall' line with score and verdict.